Pular para o conteúdo principal

Would more lobbying improve America?

The problem isn't too many lobbyists, an expert says: It's that they don't lobby hard enough. By KEVIN HARTNETT Lobbyists get a lot of bad press for pushing the causes of corporations and other special interests on Capitol Hill, trying to game the political process behind closed doors. But could it be the real problem is that they actually don’t push those interests enough? It’s a strange-sounding complaint, but political scientist Thomas Holyoke of Fresno State University has been studying the internal dynamics of lobbying for years and has come to believe that the US would be better off if lobbyists did more effective work for their clients. The problem, he writes in a new book, isn’t that corporations don’t get enough representation: It’s that lobbyists are slippery, and don’t work for their clients as much as they claim. Instead, they tell their clients what they want to hear, while chiefly acting to stay tight with their contacts in Congress. "It becomes more important to lobbyists to maintain these relationships than to accurately represent the wishes and concerns of people they’re supposed to be representing,” he says. In a country worried about corporations, lobbyists, and Congress conspiring against American taxpayers, this sounds like a surprising complaint. But good and even forceful lobbying serves an important role: it’s a direct channel for information and expertise to reach government, and one of the best ways we have of keeping Washington responsive to America. Holyoke and other scholars see lobbying as enshrined by the Founders in the First Amendment's “petition clause.” Holyoke points out that the energy industry and Google aren’t the only ones who hire lobbyists. Small cities and towns hire lobbyists. Little nonprofits hire lobbyists. Any citizen with a case to plead might hire a lobbyist. But when these less-than-fully sophisticated players step off the bus on K Street, there are untold ways they can get fleeced, and the system breaks down. In this way, lobbying is like any other industry—the less sophisticated the consumers, the more vulnerable they are and the more regulatory protection they might need. Holyoke’s new book on the topic, “The Ethical Lobbyist,” grew out of interviews he conducted for a previous project on lobbying. He noticed lobbyists would often talk about pushing compromises or massaging issues in ways that seemed to run against their clients’ interests. These are examples of a broader dynamic, officially known as the “principal-agent” problem, which crops up whenever the person you hire knows more about what’s going on than you do. “There’s an awful lot of slippage between what clients want and what their lobbyists do,” says David Lowery, a political scientist at Penn State who has done research attempting to quantify just how much slippage occurs. he issue and say, I’m trying real hard for you, we’re looking for an opening on this thing, we can do whatever BS we want to,” he says. "I know a lobbyist who was holding onto a client in the Pacific Northwest. [The client] said there are no more earmarks so we won’t need a lobbyist, and we're going to terminate [the] contract,” Marlowe says. “Sure enough on the next plane out there, the lobbyist is telling [the client] that [earmarks] are coming back. The fact is, we can’t tell any of our clients they're coming back." Marlowe, president of Warwick Group Consultants, says another favorite trick is the dog-and-pony show. A client comes in from out of town and his lobbyist arranges flashy meetings with Congress members and their staffs. Everyone in the room knows the meeting’s not actually going to move legislation. Except maybe the person paying for it. “It doesn’t have to be said or winked at. There are folks on the staff who know that they’re helping you out by setting up a meeting with them or the boss,” Marlowe says. Holyoke argues that when lobbyists mislead their clients, it has real implications for the quality of our government. Lobbyists, despite their bad name, perform an important role of presenting citizen priorities to elected officials. When they don’t carry those desires faithfully, legislation ends up being influenced by an even narrower and less democratic set of concerns. So what to do? In “The Ethical Lobbyist,” Holyoke proposes a change that would require lobbyists to file one-page position papers online spelling out exactly what they’re advocating for. Clients and their affiliates—members of the organizations that hired the lobbyists—would be able to log in and see just what their lobbyists have been up to. This wouldn’t address all potential chicanery, but it would at least help to ensure all parties are on the same page. Marlowe isn’t so sure, though. As head of the American League of Lobbyists, he tried to get the organization to adopt strong disclosure principles that would have required more people to register as lobbyists in a public database. That effort was ultimately dropped. Now he says any additional reporting requirements are only likely to increase what he sees as an even bigger problem—the expanding ranks of unofficial lobbyists who peddle influence off the books. Authors: Kevin Hartnett

Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog

POR QUE MONITORAR O LEGISLATIVO?

A primeira vez em que ouvi a palavra lobby em sua acepção política, eu estava terminando o mestrado em Sociologia Política na Unesp-Araraquara. Esse tema, muito inovador no Brasil, estava em alta na Europa, porque os acadêmicos iniciavam suas investigações para compreender a fundo as estratégias e táticas dos grupos de interesse que haviam se instalado em Bruxelas com o objetivo de influenciar o ciclo de políticas públicas no Parlamento Europeu. Era 1998 e, apesar de ter cursado Ciências Sociais, jamais tinha estudado grupos de interesse ou lobby. Estranhamente, ainda hoje é raro encontrar, na literatura de Ciência Política voltada a estudantes de graduação, uma obra que defina e discuta esses termos apropriadamente. Extremamente incomodada com o que me pareceu uma grande contradição, comecei a estudar o assunto. A literatura em português era pífia e toda a cobertura jornalística sobre a atividade de lobby a associava a corrupção e tráfico de influência. Resolvi enfrentar o desafio d…

CENÁRIO É FAVORÁVEL À REGULAMENTAÇÃO DO LOBBY, DIZEM ESPECIALISTAS E PROFISSIONAIS

BROADCAST ESTADÃO

26/11/2018 10:23:13 - POLÍTICO ESPECIAL:

CENÁRIO É FAVORÁVEL À REGULAMENTAÇÃO DO LOBBY, DIZEM ESPECIALISTAS E PROFISSIONAIS

São Paulo, 26/11/2018 - O governo do presidente eleito Jair Bolsonaro (PSL) pode favorecer a regulamentação do lobby no Brasil, avaliaram especialistas e profissionais que atuam nesse setor. O assunto está em discussão no Congresso há décadas, mas projetos que procurem determinar regras claras para a representação de interesses privados junto ao poder público até hoje custam a avançar no Legislativo. O presidente da Associação Brasileira de Relações Institucionais e Governamentais (Abrig), Guilherme Cunha Costa, afirma que integrantes do futuro governo Bolsonaro têm dado sinais favoráveis ao andamento dessa pauta no Congresso. "O agora ministro Sérgio Moro, logo na posse, deu uma sinalização forte de regulamentação e de como deve se dar o diálogo entre o público e o privado. Isso é muito importante, não só para nós, mas para toda a sociedad…

PERFIL DO PROFISSIONAL: FABÍOLA NADER MOTTA

“Trabalho perene, contínuo, no qual você não escolhe candidatos, partidos, lados. Muita transparência, ética e compliance” Conversar com alguém que está radicado em Brasília é sempre um exercício de adivinhação. A cada frase, desponta uma mistura de sotaques típica da capital federal. Com Fabíola Nader Motta, gerente de relações institucionais da Organização das Cooperativas Brasileiras (OCB), não é diferente. A cada frase, a cada cadência, o interlocutor aposta em uma região do Brasil. Mas o que aparenta é um leve acento mineiro. Fabíola, filha de militar que serviu em várias partes do País, nasceu em Juiz de Fora (MG) e se mudou muito jovem para Brasília. Pelo histórico familiar e pela profissão que escolheu, ela é, aos 31 anos, uma típica brasiliense. Outro aspecto da fala também não passa despercebido. As frases redondas, repletas de dados, resumem outra característica – desta vez, profissional. O poder de articulação e convencimento demonstra o preparo para exercer a atividade q…